Re: Need 1.0.16 libs?

To: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Need 1.0.16 libs?
From: Decklin Foster <fosterd@hartwick.edu>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 19:11:26 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 19990927191126.A522@plish.dhs.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] hhr9jkypsm.fsf@dres.lewismoss.org>
References: <[🔎] 14318.63355.499923.733355@baynetworks.com> <[🔎] 19990927074313.A5649@k6.resI.insa-lyon.fr> <[🔎] hhr9jkypsm.fsf@dres.lewismoss.org>

James LewisMoss writes:

> Ya well, I goofed.  I figured same packages.  Should be installed
> the same time as utils and media are tomorrow.  Why are they sitting
> there anyway when they clearly replace existing packages?

I belive this is because the upgraded source packages create totally
new binary packages, which take longer to move out of Incoming. This
has been griped about on debian-devel in the past; someone *may* be
working on a solution. Speak up if you have a workable idea. :-)

-- 
Decklin
Written with Debian GNU/Linux - http://www.debian.org/

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Need 1.0.16 libs?
  - From: James LewisMoss <dres@ioa.com>

References:
- Need 1.0.16 libs?
  - From: "Paul D. Smith" <pausmith@nortelnetworks.com>
- Re: Need 1.0.16 libs?
  - From: Raphael Hertzog <rhertzog@hrnet.fr>
- Re: Need 1.0.16 libs?
  - From: James LewisMoss <dres@ioa.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Need 1.0.16 libs?
Next by Date: Re: Need 1.0.16 libs?
Previous by thread: Re: Need 1.0.16 libs?
Next by thread: Re: Need 1.0.16 libs?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread