On Thu, 2025-01-23 at 01:20 -0800, Loren M. Lang wrote: > I know we are using Static-Built-Using similar to the Rust Team to track > build dependencies of libraries, but it doesn't seem to be known to > lintian. Is there a proposal to add this and eliminate the warning? https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/merge_requests/549 > In the mean time, it is worth it to add an override to hide it? Not really, since it's a false positive in Lintian rather than an edge case in the package. > Even if it's not a good idea to add it to the source package, is there a > config entry that could be added locally to tell lintiant to ignore > unknown-field in the specific case of Static-Built-Using? Not at the moment. > And a minor note, are overrides ever added for info-level lints like > spelling-error-in-binary? No. (In fact, I opened an MR to lower it to pedantic since it always gives out a ton of false positives). -- Maytham Alsudany Debian Maintainer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part