Re: Packaging of sigstore-go

[Nilesh Patra <nilesh@iki.fi>]

On 22/01/25 6:52 pm, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> I'm also curious about this.  My approach has been to prefer "p+l"
> (combined) when the binary package are more likely to be relevant as a
> interactively used end-user tool (such as 'podman', 'skopep, 'cosign'
> etc) and prefer "l+p" (both) when the binary packages are less likely to
> be relevant as interactive end-user tools (such as build tools like
> protoc plugins).

This is absolutely right. I suppose you'd follow almost the same
philosophy for source packages (with multiple binary packages) outside
of the go team as well?

The same rule applies here.

Best,
Nilesh