[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: Privatebin and build dpendency golang-go.gearno-encoding-base58



Shengjing Zhu <zhsj@debian.org> writes:

> On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 6:59 AM Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> wrote:
>>
>> ons 2024-12-11 klockan 21:01 +0000 skrev Martin Dosch:
>> > Dear Simon,
>> >
>> > Am 11.12.2024 20:59, schrieb Simon Josefsson:
>> > > The naming of golang-go.gearno-encoding-base58 is a bit weird, how
>> > > about
>> > > golang-github-gearnode-base58 and golang-github-gearnode-base58-dev
>> > > instead?  What is the Go team policy on this?
>> >
>> > as this name was created by dh-make-golang I assumed it follows the
>> > policy. But let's wait and see what some more experienced Go team
>> > members think on that one.
>>
>> I suppose that's good enough for me, but let's see if anyone responds
>> within 2 days or I'll do the upload.  I think the documented naming
>> guide is broken, I think we only rarely follow this advice:
>>
>> https://go-team.pages.debian.net/packaging.html#_naming_conventions
>>
>> In your case, that would suggest using 'base85' as the source package
>> name, which I don't think is a good idea generally.
>
> You refer to the wrong section, please read
> https://go-team.pages.debian.net/packaging.html#_naming_conventions_2
> Martin and dh-make-golang are right.

I was talking about the source package name above.

I'm confused now, which one do you suggest?

1)

dh-make-golang-style:

Source: golang-go.gearno-encoding-base58
Package: golang-go.gearno-encoding-base58-dev

2)

Our policy documents, two links above:

Source: base58
Package: golang-go.gearno-encoding-base58-dev

3)

My initial suggestion

Source: golang-github-gearno-base58
Package: golang-github-gearno-base58-dev

4)

My revised suggestion

Source: golang-github-gearno-base58
Package: golang-go.gearno-encoding-base58-dev

5)

Something else?

/Simon

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: