[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: easygen version 5.1.9



Hi again,

On 1/4/22 1:14 PM, Nilesh Patra wrote:
On 1/4/22 9:22 AM, Tong Sun wrote:
Dear Go team,

I am looking for a sponsor for the package "easygen".

I pushed to our team's Salsa:

   https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/easygen
   https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/easygen/-/jobs/2335260

This is an update to the old version and was tested on both gbp and
sbuild. It's also lintian-clean.

Could you please reviewing/sponsoring pls?

Uploaded. Do you have plans of adding autopkgtests for this? (apart from the default smoke tests)

There were some pitfalls failing the :any and :all builds (FTBFS, basically)

You had this in d/rules:

|override_dh_auto_install:
|       dh_auto_install # -- --no-source
|       dh_install -p$(BINPKG) usr/bin/easygen
|       dh_install -p$(LIBPKG) --exclude=.gitignore usr/share/gocode

Since there is a arch-indep and and arch-dep binary package, doing so is incorrect. You need to declare
these rules specifically with a "override_dh_auto_install-indep" and "override_dh_auto_install-arch"

However, for this package it is simply easier to add .install files for both. Also, it is better to prefix files like
d/docs, d/examples etc with the binary package it is meant for (d/easygen.docs,d/easygen.examples) etc.

I have pushed a few changes to salsa and uploaded. Please take a look.

Regards,
Nilesh


Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: