Hi Roger, On 8/7/22 9:38 PM, Roger Shimizu wrote:
Sorry, I don't see any merit to RM the package your mentioned. On Sat, Aug 6, 2022 at 8:50 PM Nilesh Patra <nilesh@nileshpatra.info> wrote:Hi Alexandre, Upstream of golang-github-templexxx-xor has moved to https://github.com/templexxx/xorsimd and I recently did some work to get the new package accepted - It is now in archive[1] golang-github-templexxx-xor has two reverse-deps * golang-github-audriusbutkevicius-kcp-go-dev -- This is compatible already with xorsimd and needs a tiny bit of work * golang-github-xtaci-kcp-dev - This is un-used and I have already asked for its removal.For golang-github-xtaci-kcp-dev, I maintain this package. Why did you consider it's un-used?
This was a copy paste error, sorry. This is what I meant instead: * golang-github-xtaci-kcp-dev -- This is compatible already with xorsimd and needs a tiny bit of work * golang-github-audriusbutkevicius-kcp-go-dev - This is un-used and I have already asked for its removal. Your package is _very_ relevant and has important reverse dependencies. I asked for the removal of the other (audriusbutkevicius-kcp-go-dev) package which has no reverse-deps, upstream source is missing so on.. I have asked for RM of this package (after getting permission from maintainer) in #1016705
And so, would it be okay if I ask for golang-github-templexxx-xor to be removed? -- You are listed as the only one in "Uploaders" field here and I would like to get an ACK here. [1]: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/golang-github-templexxx-xorsimd Let me know.If you want to RM the package, please make other packages working well.
I had uploaded golang-github-xtaci-kcp-dev (your package) with build-depends and depends on xorsimd along with some minor polishing yesterday. It works well -- please let me know if you have any concerns. Other thank this, golang-github-templexxx-xor has no reverse-depends or reverse-build-deps. It's upstream has moved to xorsimd and the development of former package is kind of abandoned, and hence I ask for its removal. Let me know what you think / if you have any objections or comments. -- Best, Nilesh
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature