Re: Update of golang-github-gdamore-cell to 2.*
I think the golang-github-gdamore-tcell repo should be renamed to golang-github-gdamore-tcell.v2 and created as a new repo under the golang team. I added you as a member of go-team so you can push the golang-github-rivo-tview changes. For the ones that are new repos, please use “dh-make-golang create-salsa-project” to create the repos then push to them. Once everything is pushed I’d be happy to sponsor your uploads if you’d like!
Stephen
> On Jan 22, 2021, at 9:52 AM, Daniel Milde <daniel@milde.cz> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> so I have packed my first batch of 3 packages.
>
> * updated https://salsa.debian.org/dundee/golang-github-gdamore-tcell and added .v2 suffix since it brokes some dependencies
> * updated https://salsa.debian.org/dundee/golang-github-rivo-tview (nothing broken accorgind to ratt)
> * new package https://salsa.debian.org/dundee/gdu
>
> How should I continue? Create a merge request?
>
> Thanks
> Daniel
>
> Dne 21. 01. 21 v 22:58 Stephen Gelman napsal(a):
>> Daniel,
>>
>> Does v2 work automatically with existing packages? I recommend using
>> ratt to test. If not, v2 should be uploaded as a separate package.
>>
>> Stephen
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 3:16 PM Daniel Milde <daniel@milde.cz> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> I have updated gdamore-tcell to 2.1.0 -
>>> https://salsa.debian.org/dundee/golang-github-gdamore-tcell
>>>
>>> What should I do next? I am not member of the team yet (but request
>>> sent), so I cannot push to
>>> https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-gdamore-tcell
>>>
>>> Should I create a merge request? Or wait for the membership request to
>>> be accepted?
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>> Dne 21. 01. 21 v 15:15 Utkarsh Gupta napsal(a):
>>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 2:13 PM Daniel Milde <daniel@milde.cz> wrote:
>>>>> I would like to pack https://github.com/dundee/gdu afterwards which
>>>>> needs gdamore/tcell (as it uses rivo/tview).
>>>> You can patch gdu to use the zyedidia's tcell. But of course, whatever
>>>> you're comfortable with! :)
>
Reply to: