[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Binary-only packages and DH_GOPKG



Done: https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/go-team.pages.debian.net/commit/e48dc13ed54a1427f611eb541fc2e9b8b476967c

On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 8:25 PM Tong Sun <suntong001@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes, thank you very much!

I was just hoping that the wording in
https://go-team.pages.debian.net/packaging.html also get changed, so
that the next person reading it will not get confused, as s/he might
not able to find this discussion.
On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 10:47 AM Michael Stapelberg
<michael@stapelberg.ch> wrote:
>
> Not entirely sure I follow, but:
>
> 1. The value of debian/rules’s DH_GOPKG must always match the value in debian/control’s Xs-Go-Import-Path.
>
> 2. Using DH_GOPKG in debian/rules at all is only necessary when you need to reference it from build rule overrides, e.g. https://sources.debian.org/src/golang-go-dbus/1~bzr20150122-3/debian/rules/?hl=14#L14. This is rarely necessary.
>
> Does that help?
>
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 4:24 PM Tong Sun <suntong001@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 1:52 PM Michael Stapelberg wrote:
>>
>> >> > On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 5:24 AM Tong Sun wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Does Binary-only package still need to set the DH_GOPKG variable?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >From https://go-team.pages.debian.net/packaging.html, it says:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> - - - - - - - -
>> >> >> dh-golang comes with an example debian/rules file:
>> >> >> https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/dh-golang/blob/master/example/rules
>> >> >>
>> >> >> You will need to change the value of DH_GOPKG to correspond to your
>> >> >> program’s upstream package name.
>> >> >> - - - - - - - -
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Is such "changing the value of DH_GOPKG" step still necessary?
>>
>> > Done: https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/dh-golang/commit/c3e82714f47ca715aae2ceae5f32297180a09285
>>
>> Thanks a lot Michael!
>>
>> I hope somebody else can step forward to change the wording in the
>> above doc as well, emphasizing that "changing the value of DH_GOPKG"
>> is  necessary *only* under some very specific cases (which I am not
>> clear myself yet).
>>
>> Thx!
>>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Michael


--
Best regards,
Michael

Reply to: