On 2019-01-09 6:54 a.m., Reinhard Tartler wrote: > Hi Juan, > > are you still working on this ITP? I was looking at skopeo as well, > and stumpled upon this ITP. I noticed that you created a repository on > salsa: > > https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-ostreedev-ostree-go > > This package never got uploaded. > > However, I also noticed that there is another packaging repo in salsa, > which contains a similar package that did get uploaded: > > https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-sjoerdsimons-ostree-go > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/golang-github-sjoerdsimons-ostree-go > > I wonder what the relationship between these two are. It seems that the > sjoerdsimons > version does declare it satisfies the import of the > github:ostreedev/ostree-go repo, > which makes me believe it is a fork. Looking at the upstream website will show you that yes it is a fork. (forked from ostreedev/ostree). > If this is the case, can we consider this ITP abandoned and close it? You need the package for skopeo but you want to close the ITP? I don't understand what is your end goal here. Unless the package is not needed in Debian anymore, we wouldn't close ITPs if they were abandoned. Instead, we would change them into RFPs. If you want to take over the ITP, the thing to do would be to assign it to you. Cheers, -- Alexandre Viau aviau@debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature