On 2018-07-27 08:19 AM, Martín Ferrari wrote: > My rationale is that I have to remember to close the bug manually after > doing the upload, or include it in the changelog (but for that I need to > add an extra commit). I don't mind the extra commit. FWIW the person that opens the RFS bug can even include it in the changelog himself. Bugs also allow you to mark an upload as pending. > Honestly, I would try to aim to remove the need for RFS completely. > Sadly we never got used to a PET-based workflow, where RFSs are not > needed at all, because you see what packages are ready for upload and > you can just sponsor whenever you have some free time. Seeing what package is waiting to be sponsored isn't enough for me. Bugs also contain message threads with comments/requests from the sponsor. -- Alexandre Viau aviau@debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature