Re: Binary-only packages and DH_GOPKG
Sorry Michael, I'm still not too sure what to correct and how to
correct, although I understand your explanation clearly.
I'll pass this time (but will take up other tasks that I am capable of
in the future).
Thx again.
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 12:09 PM Michael Stapelberg
<stapelberg@debian.org> wrote:
>
> The DH_GOPKG variable defaults to the value of the XS-Go-Import-Path debian/control field.
>
> If you don’t reference DH_GOPKG in any of the rules, you can therefore omit it.
>
> The example you found should be updated to no longer include DH_GOPKG, but to include XS-Go-Import-Path. Could you send a pull request please?
>
> Thank you,
>
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 5:24 AM Tong Sun <suntong001@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Does Binary-only package still need to set the DH_GOPKG variable?
>>
>> >From https://go-team.pages.debian.net/packaging.html, it says:
>>
>> - - - - - - - -
>> dh-golang comes with an example debian/rules file:
>> https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/dh-golang/blob/master/example/rules
>>
>> You will need to change the value of DH_GOPKG to correspond to your
>> program’s upstream package name.
>> - - - - - - - -
>>
>> Is such "changing the value of DH_GOPKG" step still necessary?
>>
>> Comparing to https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/dh-golang/blob/master/example/rules
>> my rule file at
>> https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/ffcvt/blob/master/debian/rules
>> doesn't have the DH_GOPKG variable but it still builds OK.
>>
>> Hence the question.
>>
>> My whole build log is at:
>> http://paste.debian.net/1056050/
>>
>> Thx.
>>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Michael
Reply to: