Re: [pkg-go] Creating RFS bugs and maybe consider posting to the new ML
Alexandre Viau wrote on 27/07/2018:
> On 2018-07-27 08:19 AM, Martín Ferrari wrote:
>> Honestly, I would try to aim to remove the need for RFS completely.
>
> Seeing what package is waiting to be sponsored isn't enough for me. Bugs
> also contain message threads with comments/requests from the sponsor.
I always used the ITP bug for this kind of discussion, and I think it's
enough. Having to open, follow, handle and close two bugs for a single
upload seems too much to me. In the Rust team the ITP is normally
skipped too.
I would favor the idea of retitling ITP bugs to RFS once the maintainer
thinks the package is ready, like it happens for RFA/ITA or O/ITA
Paride
Reply to: