[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1110123: libc6: Inconsistency detected by ld.so for some softwares after an upgrade to Trixie



Hi,

On 2025-07-30 16:25, Fabien Millioz wrote:
> Hi Aurélien,
> 
> Le mercredi 30 juillet 2025 à 16:10:25, Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
> > On 2025-07-30 10:45, Fabien Millioz wrote:
> > > Package: libc6
> > > Version: 2.41-11
> > > Severity: important
> > > 
> > > Dear Maintainer,
> > > 
> > > I upgraded to Trixie from a Bookworm with a backported kernel.
> > > 
> > > Since, a few software give me:
> > > > $ mpd
> > > > Inconsistency detected by ld.so: ../sysdeps/x86_64/dl-machine.h: 498: elf_machine_rela_relative: Assertion `ELFW(R_TYPE) (reloc->r_info) == R_X86_64_RELATIVE' failed!
> > > 
> > > The relevant software are mpd, ffmpeg, geeqie, mpv (but not mplayer or vlc), atril (but not evince), and maybe others I didn't notice yet.
> > > I rebooted the computer before doing this bugreport.
> > 
> > Thanks for your report. It seems that you have a corrupted library on
> > your system, and it is likely common to all the above software. Could
> > you please run mpv (or any affected software) with the LD_DEBUG=libs
> > option and report the output? That should be launching that command from
> > a terminal:
> > 
> >  LD_DEBUG=libs /usr/bin/mpv
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Here we go.

Thanks. Looking at it I am not sure why libopenblas.so.0 get loaded on 
your system as it is not a(n indirect) dependency of mpv. Do you 
remember if you might have manually installed some of the libraries 
depending on it? But maybe that's unrelated to the issue.

Please also check that libresolv.so.2 is not corrupted:
$ md5sum /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libresolv.so.2
beee3cba5ce568d2bf5189acf7d5c56a  /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libresolv.so.2

Finally, if all that looks correct, we might need to look at a full 
debug ouput of ld.so:

  LD_DEBUG=all /usr/bin/mpv

Regards
Aurelien

-- 
Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurelien@aurel32.net                     http://aurel32.net


Reply to: