Re: Bug#1079443: Processed: Re: dracut-install ... -m =drivers/XXX is ignored
- To: Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org>, 1079443@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: Tj <tj.iam.tj@proton.me>, debian-glibc@lists.debian.org, lange@debian.org, debian-arm@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#1079443: Processed: Re: dracut-install ... -m =drivers/XXX is ignored
- From: Stepan Golosunov <stepan@golosunov.pp.ru>
- Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2024 21:40:02 +0400
- Message-id: <[🔎] Zsoa8hvAjFiTp8xt@sghpc.golosunov.pp.ru>
- Mail-followup-to: Stepan Golosunov <stepan@golosunov.pp.ru>, Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org>, 1079443@bugs.debian.org, Tj <tj.iam.tj@proton.me>, debian-glibc@lists.debian.org, lange@debian.org, debian-arm@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] Zsn6TPmOLWQ88r_-@aurel32.net>
- References: <172449498897.2153780.8014229430596047930.reportbug@localhost> <172441025904.1525453.15334737482290375342.reportbug@localhost> <[🔎] handler.s.B1079443.17244949982778545.transcript@bugs.debian.org> <172441025904.1525453.15334737482290375342.reportbug@localhost> <[🔎] Zsn6TPmOLWQ88r_-@aurel32.net>
On Sat, Aug 24, 2024 at 05:20:44PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> control: forcemerge 916276 1079443
>
> Hi
>
> On 2024-08-24 10:27, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > Processing control commands:
> >
> > > reassign -1 glibc
> > Bug #1079443 [dracut-install] dracut-install ... -m =drivers/XXX is ignored
> > Bug reassigned from package 'dracut-install' to 'glibc'.
> > No longer marked as found in versions dracut/103-1.1.
> > Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1079443 to the same values previously set
>
> This bug keeps coming, but porters do not work on getting it fixed
> upstream.
>
> My position explained in the two other merged bugs still stands. Given
> it only affects the qemu-user case, I do not want to take any risk
> applying a patch that has not been reviewed and merged upstream. If we
> end up "missing" files in the non qemu-user case, it might have some
> security implications.
I think #1079443 is different from the other two bugs: LFS versions of
the fts_* functions are calling non-LFS __readdir. This will also fail on
large inode numbers, even without qemu.
Reply to: