Bug#1002699: libc6: m68k,sh4 readdir not returning filled in dirent pointer
- To: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>,camm@maguirefamily.org
- Cc: Camm Maguire <camm@debian.org>, 1002699@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#1002699: libc6: m68k,sh4 readdir not returning filled in dirent pointer
- From: Camm Maguire <camm@maguirefamily.org>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 09:48:57 -0500
- Message-id: <[🔎] 878ruzx6ee.fsf@maguirefamily.org>
- Reply-to: Camm Maguire <camm@maguirefamily.org>, 1002699@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <3b63bfbc-6e30-3351-596c-6f4cccb31845@physik.fu-berlin.de> (John Paul Adrian Glaubitz's message of "Thu, 30 Dec 2021 22:36:15 +0100")
- References: <874k6uszt1.fsf@transcendence.maguirefamily.org> <87y244vbej.fsf@maguirefamily.org> <808421f9-c207-7a33-5faa-68cf2cd91c24@physik.fu-berlin.de> <f8af4097-c305-5779-1344-52a96650f67e@physik.fu-berlin.de> <8735m9ludd.fsf@maguirefamily.org> <452aacc5-e022-2cb6-85b4-a85f91ba3d04@physik.fu-berlin.de> <3b63bfbc-6e30-3351-596c-6f4cccb31845@physik.fu-berlin.de> <874k6uszt1.fsf@transcendence.maguirefamily.org>
Greetings, and once again, thanks for all you do for Debian! No rush on
this item at all, needless to say.
Problem persists. What package versions should I watch for to see that
the fix has been installed?
Take care,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> writes:
> On 12/30/21 22:05, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> Well, on sh4, it failed with linker errors. Seems to be a different problem then
>> what I previously assumed. Not sure what the problem is then.
>
> The buildd hasn't picked up the updated glibc package yet [1]:
>
>> libc-bin_2.33-1 libc-dev-bin_2.33-1 libc6_2.33-1 libc6-dev_2.33-1
>
> I will regenerate the chroots.
>
> Adrian
>
>> [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gcl&arch=m68k&ver=2.6.12-117&stamp=1640457045&raw=0
--
Camm Maguire camm@maguirefamily.org
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah
Reply to: