[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#910923: $PLATFORM is no longer expanded.



control: severity -1 normal
control: retitle -1 libc6: broken support for curly braces DST

On 2018-10-13 16:13, Roman Lebedev wrote:
> Source: glibc
> Version: 2.27-6
> Severity: important
> 
> Reproduction:
> $ strace -ELD_PRELOAD='/sss/${PLATFORM}/dddd'  -s300  /bin/cat
> execve("/bin/cat", ["/bin/cat"], 0x55ddc6b820f0 /* 64 vars */) = 0
> brk(NULL)                               = 0x56046d9c1000
> access("/etc/ld.so.nohwcap", F_OK)      = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
> readlink("/proc/self/exe", "/bin/cat", 4096) = 8
> openat(AT_FDCWD, "/sss/x86_64/dddd", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
> writev(2, [{iov_base="ERROR: ld.so: object '", iov_len=22}, {iov_base="/sss/${PLATFORM}/dddd", iov_len=21}, {iov_base="' from ", iov_len=7}, {iov_base="LD_PRELOAD", iov_len=10}, {iov_base=" cannot be preloaded (", iov_len=22}, {iov_base="cannot open shared object file", iov_len=30}, {iov_base="): ignored.\n", iov_len=12}], 7ERROR: ld.so: object '/sss/${PLATFORM}/dddd' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded (cannot open shared object file): ignored.
> ) = 124
> 
> So $PLATFORM is not expanded. This is a regression from 2.24

Actually ${PLATFORM} is not expanded. If you try with $PLATFORM you will
see it is correctly expanded.

> According to
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22299
> it *should* be fixed in 2.27, but it is clerly still reproducible in
> debian testing/sid.

This is a different bug, as shown above the problem is that support for
curly braces does not work anymore.

> This is causing the following problem for me:
> https://community.sonarsource.com/t/sonarqube-c-ubuntu-build-wrapper-ld-preload-error/300/2

The workaround is to use $PLATFORM instead of ${PLATFORM}.

Aurelien

-- 
Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurelien@aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: