Re: Propose requiring Python 3.4 or later for building glibc.
- To: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
- Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>, "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org>, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>, debian-glibc@lists.debian.org, Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@gotplt.org>, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>, "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@gentoo.org>, Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org>, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>, Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>, Adam Conrad <adconrad@ubuntu.com>, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho <tuliom@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>, Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>, Helmut Grohne <helmutg@debian.org>
- Subject: Re: Propose requiring Python 3.4 or later for building glibc.
- From: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
- Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 11:51:25 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20181022095125.GA15764@aurel32.net>
- Mail-followup-to: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>, "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org>, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>, debian-glibc@lists.debian.org, Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@gotplt.org>, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>, "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@gentoo.org>, Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org>, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>, Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>, Adam Conrad <adconrad@ubuntu.com>, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho <tuliom@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>, Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>, Helmut Grohne <helmutg@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <258837a9-50bf-d2b3-950a-c28e5b411e8f@redhat.com>
- References: <258837a9-50bf-d2b3-950a-c28e5b411e8f@redhat.com>
Hi Carlos, hi all,
On 2018-10-19 09:47, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> This proposal is to being circulated to all the distribution
> maintainers to gain their acceptance surrounding the use of
> python 3.4 or greater for building glibc.
>
> There has been concern expressed that requiring python 3.4
> or greater for the bootstrap process will add an additional
> tool the the bootstrap, and specifically a tool that may not
> be available on older distributions.
>
> Python is already mostly available for distributions because
> of the integration into key OS components. Python can be
> built on older distributions, and on older distributions you
> already have to build a lot of things to compile glibc (like
> a newer gcc, and binutils).
>
> The question today is:
>
> * Is it OK to require python 3.4 or later to build glibc?
[...]
> Aurelian,
>
> Any input from Debian?
From the Debian side, the version 3.4 is not an issue at all. The
default Python 3 version in unstable (which is relevant for future
versions of glibc) is already 3.6.
We also need to consider the process of bootstrapping Debian. In that
case I believe it should also be fine as Python 3 from the host system
can be used. I have added Helmut Grohne in Cc: who is much more aware
of the bootstrapping process than me, and can confirm or infirm that.
Cheers,
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurelien@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Reply to: