Bug#888073: glibc: Support amd64 systems without /lib64
- To: javier--7C8FrOsBhwV6hRgYM4mLHJBYcgPTm9@jasp.net, 888073@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>, Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>, Javier Serrano Polo <javier@jasp.net>, debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, clint@debian.org, adconrad@0c3.net, jh@suse.cz, aj@suse.de, GNU Libc Maintainers <debian-glibc@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Bug#888073: glibc: Support amd64 systems without /lib64
- From: Michael Matz <matz@suse.de>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 13:51:30 +0000 (UTC)
- Message-id: <[🔎] alpine.LSU.2.21.1801311347530.18549@wotan.suse.de>
- Reply-to: Michael Matz <matz@suse.de>, 888073@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <1517332015.28542.33.camel@sempati.menos4>
- References: <1516908781.29513.180.camel@sempati.menos4> <[🔎] 7a0fab58-6740-795b-07e4-68d6a0a690f8@suse.de> <1516681291.14895.268.camel@sempati.menos4> <1516989938.29513.239.camel@sempati.menos4> <[🔎] alpine.LSU.2.21.1801291319560.18549@wotan.suse.de> <1516681291.14895.268.camel@sempati.menos4> <1517240112.9009.82.camel@sempati.menos4> <[🔎] alpine.LSU.2.21.1801291551380.18549@wotan.suse.de> <1516681291.14895.268.camel@sempati.menos4> <1517272433.9009.124.camel@sempati.menos4> <[🔎] alpine.LSU.2.21.1801301443010.18549@wotan.suse.de> <1516681291.14895.268.camel@sempati.menos4> <1517332015.28542.33.camel@sempati.menos4> <1516681291.14895.268.camel@sempati.menos4>
Hi,
On Tue, 30 Jan 2018, Javier Serrano Polo wrote:
> > But I fear for /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 it's too late,
>
> It is never too late. Nowadays, there are no interoperability problems,
> as I have proved in this bug report.
hmm? Here let me show you the interop problem with your suggestion:
% gcc -Wl,-dynamic-linker,/lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 -o hello ~/src/hello.c
% readelf -l hello | grep Reque
[Requesting program interpreter: /lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2]
% ./hello
bash: ./hello: No such file or directory
% ls /lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
ls: cannot access /lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2: No such file or directory
> Let us wait for your users to
> complain about manually creating a symlink.
So, uhm, you think it's acceptable to force everyone else to create a
symlink because it's not acceptable to you?
Ciao,
Michael.
Reply to: