[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#364964: marked as done (glibc-doc: futimes() fd parameter)



Your message dated Tue, 5 Dec 2017 21:13:29 +0100
with message-id <20171205201329.GA16948@aurel32.net>
and subject line Re: glibc-doc: futimes() fd parameter
has caused the Debian Bug report #364964,
regarding glibc-doc: futimes() fd parameter
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
364964: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=364964
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: glibc-doc
Version: 2.3.6-5
Severity: normal

The "File Times" node shows

    -- Function: int futimes (int *FD, struct timeval TVP[2])

but from looking at /usr/include/sys/time.h I think the fd parameter
should be just "int FD" (not a pointer).
	

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i586)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-486
Locale: LANG=en_AU, LC_CTYPE=en_AU (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.3.4

On 2006-04-27 08:49, Kevin Ryde wrote:
> Package: glibc-doc
> Version: 2.3.6-5
> Severity: normal
> 
> The "File Times" node shows
> 
>     -- Function: int futimes (int *FD, struct timeval TVP[2])
> 
> but from looking at /usr/include/sys/time.h I think the fd parameter
> should be just "int FD" (not a pointer).

This has been fixed in version 2.3.4, in upstream commit f094829e484c.
Closing the bug.

-- 
Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurelien@aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net

--- End Message ---

Reply to: