Re: Bug#822783: eztrace-contrib: FTBFS with libc 2.23: 'memcpy' was not declared in this scope

To: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>
Cc: 822783@bugs.debian.org, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>, glibc@packages.debian.org, nvidia-cuda-toolkit@packages.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#822783: eztrace-contrib: FTBFS with libc 2.23: 'memcpy' was not declared in this scope
From: Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 15:00:42 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] CAM8zJQvqNnDwjeoXOcRNr-tZW+kqKLSU=S7JD9g58rHqBFrp_A@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <CAM8zJQv+ft=rhWYNAaoUQoMwP9eKJCMCN5dTsTd4m=eY_zJ-Ow@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAM8zJQsed0HK4ThOPDMnzmtWTL4YVWnpJvPouV0M92+cKJEeMQ@mail.gmail.com> <20160428130953.GK3153@var.bordeaux.inria.fr> <20160531092733.GA15777@aurel32.net> <20160531092940.GF10830@var.bordeaux.inria.fr> <20160531093506.GG10830@var.bordeaux.inria.fr> <CAM8zJQtsW6MgrW3Xwcqyo0g5ROPMDmX7_X7nhsUCX6XUqMaSzA@mail.gmail.com> <20160607120611.GE3275@var> <CAM8zJQv+ft=rhWYNAaoUQoMwP9eKJCMCN5dTsTd4m=eY_zJ-Ow@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Samuel

This bug is RC since the recent upload of glibc 2.23 to unstable.
Seeing that -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 is required to trigger this bug,
should I lower the severity or close the bug?

Regards
Graham

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bug#822783: eztrace-contrib: FTBFS with libc 2.23: 'memcpy' was not declared in this scope
  - From: Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org>

Prev by Date: [glibc] branch glibc-2.24 updated (ae27a23 -> d9f6017)
Next by Date: Video: Drone Captures Live Strike of Monster Pike; Former Boxer Knocks Out Black Bear in Self Defense
Previous by thread: [glibc] 01/01: debian/testsuite-xfail-debian.mk: allow more failures on kfreebsd-*, mostly due to the fsid_t type, and which are not regressions.
Next by thread: Re: Bug#822783: eztrace-contrib: FTBFS with libc 2.23: 'memcpy' was not declared in this scope
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread