[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#825421: Re : Bug#825421: libc6: Unable to upgrade



On 2016-05-27 16:06, nicolas.patrois@gmail.com wrote:
> Le 27/05/2016 11:52:01, Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
> 
> > This is not something reproducible here, so it probably depends on 
> > the state of your system. Can you please copy and paste the upgrade
> > messages so that we have a better view of the issue?
> 
> Here is the output in English:
> 
> # aptitude full-upgrade
> The following NEW packages will be installed:
>   libdata-alias-perl{a} 
> The following packages will be upgraded:
>   libc-dev-bin libc6{b} libc6-amd64 libc6-dbg libc6-dev libc6-dev-amd64 
> libc6-dev-x32 libc6-x32 libxfont-dev libxfont1{b} 
>   lintian{b} python-enum{b} xul-ext-personasplus{b} 
> 13 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 5 not 
> upgraded.
> Need to get 25.8 MB of archives. After unpacking 3672 kB will be freed.
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>  python-enum : Conflicts: python-enum34 but 1.1.5-1 is installed.
>  libc6 : Conflicts: libc6-i686 but 2.22-7 is installed.
>  lintian : Breaks: funny-manpages (< 1.3-5.1) but 1.3-5 is installed.
>  libxfont1 : Breaks: xfs (< 1:1.1.4) but 1:1.0.8-7 is installed.
>  libc6-i686 : PreDepends: libc6 (= 2.22-7) but 2.22-9 is to be 
> installed.
>  xul-ext-personasplus : Breaks: thunderbird (< 3.3~a1) but 
> 1.5.0.10.dfsg1-3 is installed.
> The following actions will resolve these dependencies:
> 
>      Remove the following packages:
> 1)     funny-manpages              
> 2)     libc6-i686                  
> 3)     python-enum                 
> 4)     xfs                         
> 5)     xul-ext-personasplus        
> 
> 
> 
> Accept this solution? [Y/n/q/?] q

I don't know about the other packages, but it's pretty normal that
libc6-i686 is getting removed as it is now provided by libc6. So it
doesn't look like a bug to me.

Aurelien

-- 
Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurelien@aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net


Reply to: