Processed: Re: bug#22793: grep -E assertion failure with back references
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 glibc
Bug #186568 [grep] grep: egrep assertion failure on unstable
Bug #292550 [grep] grep: Problems with back references
Bug reassigned from package 'grep' to 'glibc'.
Bug reassigned from package 'grep' to 'glibc'.
No longer marked as found in versions grep/2.5.1.ds2-4, 2.5.1.ds2-6, 2.5.1-4, and 2.5.1.ds1-4.
No longer marked as found in versions 2.5.1.ds1-4, 2.5.1.ds2-6, 2.5.1-4, and grep/2.5.1.ds2-4.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #186568 to the same values previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #292550 to the same values previously set
> retitle -1 "ERE '0|()0|\1|0' causes regexec undefined behavior"
Bug #186568 [glibc] grep: egrep assertion failure on unstable
Bug #292550 [glibc] grep: Problems with back references
Changed Bug title to '"ERE '0|()0|\1|0' causes regexec undefined behavior"' from 'grep: egrep assertion failure on unstable'
Changed Bug title to '"ERE '0|()0|\1|0' causes regexec undefined behavior"' from 'grep: Problems with back references'
> forwarded -1 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18986
Bug #186568 [glibc] "ERE '0|()0|\1|0' causes regexec undefined behavior"
Bug #292550 [glibc] "ERE '0|()0|\1|0' causes regexec undefined behavior"
Changed Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18986' from 'http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=22793'
Changed Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18986' from 'http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=22793'
> tags -1 + patch
Bug #186568 [glibc] "ERE '0|()0|\1|0' causes regexec undefined behavior"
Bug #292550 [glibc] "ERE '0|()0|\1|0' causes regexec undefined behavior"
Added tag(s) patch.
Added tag(s) patch.
--
186568: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=186568
292550: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=292550
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
Reply to: