r6848 - glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.22/debian
Author: aurel32
Date: 2015-12-29 23:50:57 +0000 (Tue, 29 Dec 2015)
New Revision: 6848
Modified:
glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.22/debian/changelog
glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.22/debian/testsuite-xfail-debian.mk
Log:
debian/testsuite-xfail-debian.mk: allow stdlib/tst-makecontext to fail
on armel and armhf, as it is a new test introduced with glibc 2.22 and
not a regression.
Modified: glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.22/debian/changelog
===================================================================
--- glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.22/debian/changelog 2015-12-29 23:31:33 UTC (rev 6847)
+++ glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.22/debian/changelog 2015-12-29 23:50:57 UTC (rev 6848)
@@ -48,6 +48,9 @@
* debian/debhelper.in/libc{,-alt,otherbuild).install: stop shipping
testsuite results as it make the package build non-reproducible in case
of different kernels and race conditions in the testsuite.
+ * debian/testsuite-xfail-debian.mk: allow stdlib/tst-makecontext to fail
+ on armel and armhf, as it is a new test introduced with glibc 2.22 and
+ not a regression.
-- Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org> Thu, 10 Dec 2015 23:41:13 +0100
Modified: glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.22/debian/testsuite-xfail-debian.mk
===================================================================
--- glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.22/debian/testsuite-xfail-debian.mk 2015-12-29 23:31:33 UTC (rev 6847)
+++ glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.22/debian/testsuite-xfail-debian.mk 2015-12-29 23:50:57 UTC (rev 6848)
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@
ifeq ($(config-machine)-$(config-os),arm-linux-gnueabi)
test-xfail-test-misc = yes
test-xfail-tst-backtrace6 = yes
+test-xfail-tst-makecontext = yes
test-xfail-tst-mqueue5 = yes
test-xfail-tst-stack4 = yes
test-xfail-tst-waitid = yes
@@ -75,6 +76,7 @@
ifeq ($(config-machine)-$(config-os),arm-linux-gnueabihf)
test-xfail-test-fenv = yes
test-xfail-tst-backtrace6 = yes
+test-xfail-tst-makecontext = yes
test-xfail-tst-stack4 = yes
test-xfail-tst-mqueue5 = yes
test-xfail-tst-waitid = yes
Reply to: