Hi Aurelien, On Dienstag, 22. Dezember 2015, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > nice! but this is not available yet in sid+testing yet, or is it? (or > > maybe rather: what does "2.6.32 support" mean here???) > I meant 2.6.32 kernel support, and it's already in testing and sid. I have to admit, I cannot follow: - if this is fixed, why is 806911 still open? - also, the hosts runs jessie and this is where we run linux64 on and from, so how are changes in sid+testing relevant in our setup anyway? (actually we run jessie, sometimes with jessie kernels and and on some other hosts with bpo kernels or even never…) - why did you 2.6._32_ mention at all, and not "2.6" (or maybe 2.6.56)? - and, finally, in conclusion, is it safe to enable building with "linux64 -- uname2.6" again? I'd very much appreciate clearing up these questions, I'm lost. cheers, Holger
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.