[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Processed (with 3 errors): limit source to eglibc, tagging 746310, tagging 689427, tagging 745552, tagging 747013 ...



Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> #eglibc (2.18-6) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
> #
> #  * patches/any/cvs-make-4.0.diff: patch from upstream to allow GNU Make
> #    4.0 and greater.  Closes: #747013.
> #  * patches/sparc/cvs-strcmp.diff: patch from upstream to fix a corner case
> #    in the sparc specific strcmp() implementation.  Closes: #746310.
> #  * debhelper.in/nscd.init: invalidate nscd cache on startup.  Closes:
> #    #689427.
> #  * patches/any/cvs-wprintf.diff: patch from upstream to correctly handle
> #    %p in wprintf().  Closes: #729514.
> #  * control.in/*: add conflicts between multiarch libc packages using the same
> #    dynamic library loader.  Closes: #745552.
> #
> limit source eglibc
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'eglibc'
Limit currently set to 'source':'eglibc'

> tags 746310 + pending
source: "eglibc, glibc"' does not match at least one of "eglibc"
Failed to alter tags of Bug 746310: limit failed for bugs: 746310.

> tags 689427 + pending
source: "eglibc, glibc"' does not match at least one of "eglibc"
Failed to alter tags of Bug 689427: limit failed for bugs: 689427.

> tags 745552 + pending
Bug #745552 [src:eglibc] libc6: undeclared file conflict between libc6:sparc and libc6-i386:amd64
Added tag(s) pending.
> tags 747013 + pending
Bug #747013 [src:eglibc] src:eglibc: FTBFS with make 4.0
Added tag(s) pending.
> tags 729514 + pending
source: "eglibc, glibc"' does not match at least one of "eglibc"
Failed to alter tags of Bug 729514: limit failed for bugs: 729514.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
745552: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=745552
747013: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=747013
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems


Reply to: