[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#738575: pthread: segfault in libpthread on Intel Galileo board



Package: libc6
Version: 2.13-38
Severity: normal
File: pthread

Dear Maintainer,

I bootstrapped a Debian base system via "debootstrap --arch i386 wheezy ./newfiles http://http.debian.net/debian/"; and put it on a Galileo board. On the Galileo board there new Intel Quark IA processor - which is basically a 486 with some instructions extensions from Pentium.
If I boot the existing Galileo kernel with the bootstrapped fileset, many applications crash with a segfault in pthread.
To reporduce, follow the instruction on https://communities.intel.com/message/220080
Here are ways to reproduce consistently - many other apps show the same behavior
1. Boot the system, create a new user (non root), connect to the board via ssh - the sshd will crash with a segfault in pthread
2. Do a 'apt-get install cowsay' - at the end, apt-get will crash with a segfault in pthread

sshd[2519]: segfault at b7173107 ip b714f07b sp bf97ea94 error ffff0007 in libpthread-2.13.so[b714a000+15000]

incorrect behavior: segfault - applications stop working
expected behavior: no crash

uname -a = Linux galileo 3.8.7-yocto-standard #1 Wed Jan 15 00:21:32 CET 2014 i586 GNU/Linux
dpkg -s libc6 = 2.13-38



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.3
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i586)

Kernel: Linux 3.8.7-yocto-standard
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages libc6:i386 depends on:
ii  libc-bin  2.13-38
ii  libgcc1   1:4.7.2-5

Versions of packages libc6:i386 recommends:
pn  libc6-i686  <none>

Versions of packages libc6:i386 suggests:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]  1.5.49
pn  glibc-doc              <none>
pn  locales                <none>

-- debconf information:
  glibc/restart-services:
  libraries/restart-without-asking: false
  glibc/disable-screensaver:
  glibc/upgrade: true
  glibc/restart-failed:


Reply to: