Re: Bug#699818: pre-approval for pu: eglibc - timer_settime broken on kfreebsd-amd64
- To: Adam Conrad <adconrad@0c3.net>, Petr Salinger <petr.salinger@seznam.cz>, debian-glibc@lists.debian.org
- Cc: 699818@bugs.debian.org,
- Subject: Re: Bug#699818: pre-approval for pu: eglibc - timer_settime broken on kfreebsd-amd64
- From: intrigeri <intrigeri@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 19:00:09 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 85iotdmd06.fsf@boum.org>
- In-reply-to: <20131204140009.GG4822@betterave.cristau.org> (Julien Cristau's message of "Wed, 4 Dec 2013 15:00:10 +0100")
- References: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1306211409180.14897@contest.felk.cvut.cz> <1380662602.5700.24.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org> <20131002151402.GG16259@0c3.net> <a6fabaf14c879179987357d831b63ff9@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org> <20131204140009.GG4822@betterave.cristau.org>
Hi,
Julien Cristau wrote (04 Dec 2013 14:00:10 GMT) :
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 16:44:41 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> On 2013-10-02 16:14, Adam Conrad wrote:
>> >On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 10:23:22PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> >>
>> >>That looks okay. In terms of the other suggested updates, as a
>> >>non-release architecture for wheezy, hurd-specific patches
>> >>aren't really
>> >>appropriate for a stable update.
>> >
>> >Perhaps not appropriate to upload just for Hurd, but hurd-specific
>> >patches that don't touch other arches also seem harmless. I'm happy
>> >to back them out, though, if it's a sticking point.
>>
>> Well, they don't really meet the definition of minimal changes. :-)
>> If someone puts together a debdiff including them, I'm more than
>> happy to look at that and we can make a call from there. (Bearing in
>> mind that the window for 7.2 closes over the coming weekend.)
>>
> Any news here? We're now nearing the end of the window for 7.3.
Ping? The next point-release is coming soon.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
Reply to: