Processed: Re: Shouldn't description mention also 3.2 kernels?

To: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Cc: debian-glibc@lists.debian.org
Subject: Processed: Re: Shouldn't description mention also 3.2 kernels?
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 02:15:13 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] handler.s.C.135190852517605.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
References: <[🔎] 20121103020835.GB3717@elie.Belkin>

Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> severity 692154 minor
Bug #692154 [libc6-i686] Shouldn't description mention also 3.2 kernels?
Severity set to 'minor' from 'normal'
> tags 692154 + patch
Bug #692154 [libc6-i686] Shouldn't description mention also 3.2 kernels?
Added tag(s) patch.
> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
692154: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692154
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#692154: Shouldn't description mention also 3.2 kernels?
  - From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Bug#692154: Shouldn't description mention also 3.2 kernels?
Next by Date: Bug#691605: fixed
Previous by thread: Bug#692154: Shouldn't description mention also 3.2 kernels?
Next by thread: Bug#692154: Shouldn't description mention also 3.2 kernels?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread