[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#317466: Bug#534521: this is a bug in eglibc, not in pax



Aurelien Jarno dixit:

>I disagree. Pax isn't built with large file support (because <fts.h>
>doesn't allow that), so even if eglibc is fixed, pax would need to be
>fixed. Blocking bug should be used instead.

Right, I could have thought of that.

>The problem is not having fts_read64, but having a different FTSENT 
>structure.

The structure is changed along with the functions called.

Hrm, I think if users of this pass FTSENT pointers around
among themselves, this could indeed lead to problems. Damn.

How about providing a libfts64? (Or, more generic, a library
where everything where this is an issue has been built with
a 64-bit off_t)

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
  “Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having
          a peeing section in a swimming pool.”
						-- Edward Burr



Reply to: