[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#693895: eglibc: FTBFS on powerpcspe



tag 693895 + moreinfo
thanks

On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 03:44:06PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
> Source: eglibc
> Version: 2.13-37
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch sid
> User: debian-powerpcspe@breakpoint.cc
> Usertags: powerpcspe
> 
> Hi,
> 
> eglibc currently FTBFS on powerpcspe[1] like this:
> 
> make[2]: Target `check' not remade because of errors.
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»'
> make[1]: *** [check] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»/build-tree/powerpcspe-libc'
> #
> # Testsuite failures, someone should be working towards
> # fixing these! They are listed here for the purpose of
> # regression testing during builds.
> # Format: <Failed test>, Error <Make error code> [(ignored)]
> #
> annexc.out, Error 1 (ignored)
> bug-nextafter.out, Error 18
> bug-nexttoward.out, Error 18
> check-localplt.out, Error 1
> test-double.out, Error 1
> test-fenv.out, Error 1
> test-float.out, Error 1
> test-idouble.out, Error 1
> test-ifloat.out, Error 1
> test-misc.out, Error 1
> tst-cancel4.out, Error 1
> tst-cancel5.out, Error 1
> tst-cancelx4.out, Error 1
> tst-cancelx5.out, Error 1
> tst-cputimer1.out, Error 1
> tst-key1.out, Error 1
> tst-key4.out, Error 1
> tst-setcontext-fpscr.o, Error 1
> ***************
> Encountered regressions that don't match expected failures:
> tst-cancel4.out, Error 1
> tst-cancel5.out, Error 1
> tst-cancelx4.out, Error 1
> tst-cancelx5.out, Error 1
> tst-key1.out, Error 1
> tst-key4.out, Error 1
> make: *** [/«PKGBUILDDIR»/stamp-dir/check_libc] Error 1
> dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build-arch gave error exit status 2
> [...]
> 
> Attaching a patch that fixes this.
> 

More than fixes the issues, it just ignores them. Have you investigated
why these tests are failing? Ignoring the tst-key1 and tst-key4 tests
seems a bit worrying to me.

-- 
Aurelien Jarno	                        GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurelien@aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net


Reply to: