Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
2012/6/27 Helge Kreutzmann <debian@helgefjell.de>:
> Hello,
> you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:
>
> ro_RO
>
> This locale comes with a statement
>
> % Distribution and use is free, also
> % for commercial purposes.
>
> Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
> statement was meant as a license.
>
> As discussed in
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
> locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
> great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).
>
> To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
> question:
>
> Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
> e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?
Yes, of course. GPL/LGPL v2+ is OK. Same for any other copyleft license.
> If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
> contact me (via the reply-to address set).
>
> Thanks for helping to resolve this!
>
> Helge
>
> --
> Dr. Helge Kreutzmann debian@helgefjell.de
> Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
> 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
> Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFP6r2DRsxcY/MYpWoRAuznAJ9j9Jcx4LFov/BCoqfenmJkPeu7iwCffT39
> WAfakavcn7LbwSSmW+SHLiU=
> =AkQ3
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
--
Regards,
EddyP
=============================================
"Imagination is more important than knowledge" A.Einstein
Reply to: