[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#670883: ld.so.8: too much removed, or not enough



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Le 29/04/2012 19:46, David Prévot a écrit :

> The last documented environment variables, LD_ASSUME_KERNEL, has its
> text cut:

Same remark for LD_VERBOSE (definition ends with “(ie. either”). There
is also a missing “.TP” in the line preceding it's definition, if you
didn't want to remove it completely:

- --- /tmp/ld.so.8.orig   2012-04-29 19:54:37.000000000 -0400
+++ /tmp/ld.so.8        2012-04-29 19:54:58.000000000 -0400
@@ -199,10 +199,11 @@
 If
 .B LD_USE_LOAD_BIAS
 is defined with the value 0,
 neither executables nor PIEs will honor the base addresses.
 This variable is ignored by set-user-ID and set-group-ID programs.
+.TP
 .B LD_VERBOSE
 If set to non-empty string, output symbol versioning information
 about the program if querying information about the program (ie. either
 .TP
 .B LD_WARN


LD_PROFILE_OUTPUT definition was moved, but its first lined has been
skipped, thus partially renaming it as LD_PROFILE:

- --- /tmp/ld.so.8.orig   2012-04-29 19:54:37.000000000 -0400
+++ /tmp/ld.so.8        2012-04-29 20:04:26.000000000 -0400
@@ -170,6 +170,9 @@
 the pointers for use in the event of a buffer overrun or
 stack-smashing attack.
 .TP
+.B
+LD_PROFILE_OUTPUT
+File where
 .B LD_PROFILE
 output should be written.
 If this variable is not defined, or is defined as an empty string,

If the purpose was to move LD_PROFILE, it's definition was simply:

.TP
.B LD_PROFILE
Shared object to be profiled.


Regards

David

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=wuSe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: