Re: transition status
On Sat, 2012-02-25 at 12:20 +0000, Robert Millan wrote:
> 660403: cdparanoia: FTFBS on kfreebsd-*
> -> Unless there's further activity I recommend removing of kfreebsd-*
> binaries from testing. See
That doesn't work. The choices would be removing the kfreebsd-*
binaries from unstable, and letting that propagate, or removing the
entire package from testing.
> 660397: qpxtool: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*
> 660401: dvd+rw-tools: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*
> -> (eglibc bug) Tagged pending by maintainer since 20th Feb. Should it
> be NMUed? CCing maintainer.
That's still less than a week. Aurelien, are there any plans for an
upload in the near future?
> 660396: sane-backends: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*
> -> (kfreebsd-kernel-headers bug) Fixed today in 0.75. BinNMU?
They were already binNMUed, that's how I discovered the bug. ;-p I'll
give them back with a dependency on the new k-k-h.
btw, http://bugs.debian.org/src:kfreebsd-kernel-headers still lists two
outstanding RC bugs. You need to use versioned -done mails, not just
add fixed versions.
There's also mednafen and xine-lib, which I think have transitive
dependencies via libsdl1.2? The latter still seems to be FTBFS on
kfreebsd-amd64, despite the patch from #659615 being applied. I've just
given it back for one last try.
fwiw, there's a possibility that vlc might be a blocker, given that the
new upstream version is FTBFS on multiple architectures (including