Re: Bug#619988: transition: eglibc 2.13
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 01:05:57PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Only four reverse-deps in the archive that have strict versioned deps on an
> upstream version of eglibc due to private symbols: libnss-db, dante, libnih,
> unscd. All leaf packages, currently up-to-date in testing, no entanglements
> with other current transitions. Other packages may pick up versioned deps
> on libc 2.13 when uploaded and block other transitions temporarily while
> eglibc clears, but no two-way entanglement and eglibc 2.13 seems to have
> been rather thoroughly tested in experimental already so there's reason to
> believe the transition will be quick.
>
> Ack from me, please go ahead.
>
Thanks for the ack. Even if I think eglibc has been correctly tested, I
still expect a few bugs appearing when more people test the package. I
won't be able to do any real debugging from next Wednesday to Monday
25th (even if I will be online from time to time), so I am planning to
do the upload around the 24th-25th. Of course if someone volunteer to
take care of the bugs during that period, I can upload it earlier.
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurelien@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
Reply to: