Re: [SRM] Uploading new upstream stable version to Squeeze?
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 10:04:42PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 23:30 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 04:30:41PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2011-08-13 at 14:47 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:48:51AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > > > Given the timescales of the upcoming 6.0.2 and the larger-than-usual
> > > > > size of the diff, we'd prefer to look at getting this uploaded early in
> > > > > the 6.0.3 cycle, to give us a longer period with the updated version
> > > > > available for testing.
> > >
> > > We're now rather late in the 6.0.3 cycle - in fact, the point release
> > > should already have happened (there's been a small amount of scheduling
> > > fail).
> >
> > Does it mean we should consider it for the 6.0.4 cycle instead?
>
> That might be a better idea, but possibly depends on when the 6.0.3
> release ends up being, which is somewhat up in the air still; sorry for
> messing you around on this. Hopefully we'll have more of a plan soon.
>
> > > > Unfortunately the 2.11.4 release never happened upstream, it's seems to
> > > > be blocked currently.
> > >
> > > Is there any hint as to whether that's likely to be a short-term issue,
> > > or to persist for some time?
> > >
> > Given I haven't got any answer to the mails I sent to the call for
> > testing thread, I don't expect this issue will be fixed soon.
>
> That is rather unfortunate, indeed. :-(
There has been some activity on the 2.11 branch upstream, with some more
fixes (mainly integrating patches we had in Debian), though we don't
have much informations about when 2.11.4 is going to be released.
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurelien@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
Reply to: