Processed: Re: argp_*(): OPTION_DOC should imply OPTION_NO_USAGE

To: Daniel Hartwig <mandyke@gmail.com>
Cc: GNU Libc Maintainers <debian-glibc@lists.debian.org> (libc6 for {296367})
Subject: Processed: Re: argp_*(): OPTION_DOC should imply OPTION_NO_USAGE
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 19:00:05 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] handler.s.C.131378023425236.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] CAN3veReOVhvEAxL1h3-X58m8C51o6AcOLX=-_+nduPDq9xUBUw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] CAN3veReOVhvEAxL1h3-X58m8C51o6AcOLX=-_+nduPDq9xUBUw@mail.gmail.com>

Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 296367 + patch
Bug #296367 [libc6] argp_*(): OPTION_DOC should imply OPTION_NO_USAGE
Added tag(s) patch.
> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
296367: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=296367
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#296367: argp_*(): OPTION_DOC should imply OPTION_NO_USAGE
  - From: Daniel Hartwig <mandyke@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Bug#296367: argp_*(): OPTION_DOC should imply OPTION_NO_USAGE
Next by Date: r4894 - /
Previous by thread: Bug#296367: argp_*(): OPTION_DOC should imply OPTION_NO_USAGE
Next by thread: r4894 - /
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread