[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#637218: /usr/include/gnu/stubs.h:7:27: fatal error: gnu/stubs-32.h: No such file or directory



Sedat Dilek wrote:

> What means "libtool bug (already fixed)" and where is/was it fixed -
> upstream? In Debian package?

Last time, I ran into trouble with the copy of libtool in the gcc tree
(it would gobble up -B flags), and using the system libtool helped.
But now I can't reproduce that problem anymore --- it was probably
user error of some kind on my part.

I've just started a new gcc build with

	$ git reset --hard origin/master
	$ git clean -fdx
	$ ./configure --prefix=$HOME/opt/gcc \
		CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET="-g -O2 -B/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu"
	$ make BOOT_CFLAGS="-g -O2 -B/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu"

To get a sense of where I am in the build process: the last line
output was

| /bin/sh ../libtool --tag CXX   --mode=compile /home/jrn/src/gcc/host-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/gcc/xgcc -shared-libgcc -B/home/jrn/src/gcc/host-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/gcc -nostdinc++ -L/home/jrn/src/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src -L/home/jrn/src/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs -B/home/jrn/opt/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/home/jrn/opt/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem /home/jrn/opt/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/include -isystem /home/jrn/opt/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/sys-include     -I/home/jrn/src/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -I/home/jrn/src/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include -I/home/jrn/src/gcc/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++  -fno-implicit-templates -Wall -Wextra -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual  -fdiagnostics-show-location=once  -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections  -frandom-seed=wlocale-inst.lo -g -O2 -D_GNU_SOURCE -c -o wlocale-inst.lo ../../.././libstdc++-v3/src/wlocale-inst.cc

Seems to be working well so far; I'm cautiously optimistic.  gcc is
4.6.1-6, libc 2.13-16.

If that works, next step will be to try a build on i386.  I'm
cautiously optimistic.



Reply to: