[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#617759: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/icedove/components/libdbusservice.so: undefined symbol: NS_Alloc



On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 09:02:19AM +0200, Sebastian Bremicker wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I don't see my previous mail in the sent folder and also forgot to cc
> the bugtracker, so here I go again:
> 
> > > A far fetched thought maybe, but me using mozilla.debian.net's
> > > experimental iceweasel (v5 as of yesterday in the evening, v4 before
> > > that) couldn't be related, could it?
> > I thought of that, too when I first ran into this.  Luckily I don't
> > think they're related, since they use different copies of xulrunner.
> > Attempts along the lines of "uninstall iceweasel, experiment, install
> > iceweasel, experiment more" didn't get me anywhere.
> 
> OK, just to be sure ;).
> 
> > > I also have experimental's sources active but only cherry-pick some
> > > packages from it. As far as I know our dependency list should be quite
> > > the same apart from those two packages mentioned above as I see no
> > > other packages having alternatives.
> > 
> > Ah, sorry to be dense.  Here's a current list, for convenient
> > diff-ing.
> > [...]
> 
> OK, when doing this:
> 
> sebrem@neocortex:~$ diff sebrem jonathan
> 3c3
> < libc6 2.13-1
> ---
> > libc6 2.13-2
> 7,8c7,8
> < libdrm2       2.4.24-2
> < libegl1-mesa
> ---
> > libdrm2       2.4.25-1
> > libegl1-mesa  7.10-4
> 14,15c14,15
> < libgl1-mesa-glx       7.10.2-1
> < libglib2.0-0  2.28.6-1
> ---
> > libgl1-mesa-glx       7.10.2-2
> > libglib2.0-0  2.28.6-2
> 40c40
> < zlib1g        1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3
> ---
> > zlib1g        1:1.2.5.dfsg-1

Can you try do downgrade this one? There have been plenty of issue with
versions from experimental, though they don't match the error message.

Also that might sound stupid, but do you have any library installed in
/usr/lib/local ?

-- 
Aurelien Jarno	                        GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurelien@aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net



Reply to: