On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 02:29:26PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > [1] As you said pre-depends are messy but the safe bet. It would be best if > > we could somehow ensure that libc6 is upgraded first and that everything > > needed for the unpack is still there at that point (i.e. some liberal > > use of pre-depends somewhere in just the base set instead of everywhere). > Ok. I think that's certainly going to be more manageable than trying to add > pre-depends to everything, anyway. Any concerns about bumping the > dependency for all libraries via dpkg-shlibdeps? What's the timeframe for eglibc to be ready? If it's able to migrate to testing fairly soon and as it's just shlibdeps and as it's at the beginning of the cycle, I don't really see any. It should not be the primary blocker for migration for weeks, though. Kind regards Philipp Kern
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature