r4497 - in glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.13/debian: . patches/kfreebsd
Author: ps-guest
Date: 2011-02-07 17:24:08 +0000 (Mon, 07 Feb 2011)
New Revision: 4497
Modified:
glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.13/debian/changelog
glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.13/debian/patches/kfreebsd/local-sysdeps.diff
Log:
kfreebsd/local-sysdeps.diff: update to revision 3252 (from glibc-bsd)
Modified: glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.13/debian/changelog
===================================================================
--- glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.13/debian/changelog 2011-02-07 09:46:32 UTC (rev 4496)
+++ glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.13/debian/changelog 2011-02-07 17:24:08 UTC (rev 4497)
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@
ADJUNCT_AS_SHADOW to TRUE. This avoid NIS password leakage
(CVE-2010-0015), but can be changed to FALSE to accomomdate some
NIS installations. Closes: #566297, #566844.
- * kfreebsd/local-sysdeps.diff: update to revision 3251 (from glibc-bsd)
+ * kfreebsd/local-sysdeps.diff: update to revision 3252 (from glibc-bsd)
Closes: #602776.
* debian/rules: split build-indep and build-arch targets. Closes:
#611926.
Modified: glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.13/debian/patches/kfreebsd/local-sysdeps.diff
===================================================================
--- glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.13/debian/patches/kfreebsd/local-sysdeps.diff 2011-02-07 09:46:32 UTC (rev 4496)
+++ glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.13/debian/patches/kfreebsd/local-sysdeps.diff 2011-02-07 17:24:08 UTC (rev 4497)
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@
+endif
--- /dev/null
+++ b/ports/sysdeps/unix/bsd/bsd4.4/kfreebsd/Versions
-@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+@@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
+libc {
+ # The comment lines with "#errlist-compat" are magic; see errlist-compat.awk.
+ # When you get an error from errlist-compat.awk, you need to add a new
@@ -278,6 +278,12 @@
+ #errlist-compat 94
+ _sys_errlist; sys_errlist; _sys_nerr; sys_nerr;
+ }
++ GLIBC_2.13 {
++ jail_attach;
++ jail_remove;
++ jail_get;
++ jail_set;
++ }
+ GLIBC_PRIVATE {
+ # needed by libpthread.
+ __clone; __libc_fork; __libc_sigaction;
Reply to: