Bug#576030: marked as done (libc6: wcstoll returns only the value for 32bit.)
Your message dated Mon, 7 Feb 2011 00:06:56 +0100
with message-id <20110206230655.GA5462@volta.aurel32.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#576030: gcc-4.3: wcstoll returns only the value for 32bit.
has caused the Debian Bug report #576030,
regarding libc6: wcstoll returns only the value for 32bit.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
576030: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=576030
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: gcc-4.3: wcstoll returns only the value for 32bit.
- From: Hikaru MIYAGI <hc5miya@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 23:32:50 +0900
- Message-id: <20100331143250.2419.79453.reportbug@MIYAGIPC03>
Package: gcc-4.3
Version: 4.3.2-1.1
Severity: important
wcstoll returns only the value for 32bit.
For instance, wcstoll(L"100000000", NULL, 16) returns 0
though it is sure to become 4294967296.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.4
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (990, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-miyagipc03 (SMP w/1 CPU core; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ja_JP.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages gcc-4.3 depends on:
ii binutils 2.18.1~cvs20080103-7 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii cpp-4.3 4.3.2-1.1 The GNU C preprocessor
ii gcc-4.3-base 4.3.2-1.1 The GNU Compiler Collection (base
ii libc6 2.7-18lenny2 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libgcc1 1:4.3.2-1.1 GCC support library
ii libgomp1 4.3.2-1.1 GCC OpenMP (GOMP) support library
Versions of packages gcc-4.3 recommends:
ii libc6-dev 2.7-18lenny2 GNU C Library: Development Librari
Versions of packages gcc-4.3 suggests:
pn gcc-4.3-doc <none> (no description available)
pn gcc-4.3-locales <none> (no description available)
pn gcc-4.3-multilib <none> (no description available)
pn libgcc1-dbg <none> (no description available)
pn libgomp1-dbg <none> (no description available)
pn libmudflap0-4.3-dev <none> (no description available)
pn libmudflap0-dbg <none> (no description available)
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Hikaru MIYAGI <hc5miya@gmail.com>
- Cc: 576030-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#576030: gcc-4.3: wcstoll returns only the value for 32bit.
- From: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
- Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 00:06:56 +0100
- Message-id: <20110206230655.GA5462@volta.aurel32.net>
- In-reply-to: <20100530113455.GH17694@hall.aurel32.net>
- References: <20100331143250.2419.79453.reportbug@MIYAGIPC03> <20100402093255.GA22818@volta.aurel32.net> <20100530113455.GH17694@hall.aurel32.net>
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 01:34:55PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 11:32:55AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:32:50PM +0900, Hikaru MIYAGI wrote:
> > > Package: gcc-4.3
> > > Version: 4.3.2-1.1
> > > Severity: important
> > >
> > > wcstoll returns only the value for 32bit.
> > > For instance, wcstoll(L"100000000", NULL, 16) returns 0
> > > though it is sure to become 4294967296.
> > >
> >
> > This is not reproducible here. Are you sure the wcstoll is correctly
> > declared?
> >
> > You can verify that it is correctly declared by compiling with -Wall. If
> > it is not the case, verify that your program should include <wchar.h> and
> > that you use either use -std=c99 or -D_GNU_SOURCE to compile it.
> >
>
> Any news on that?
>
The bug is not reproducible, and I got no answer from the submitter.
Closing the bug.
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurelien@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
--- End Message ---
Reply to: