[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#563049: marked as done (Depends: libc6 (> 2.11) probable wrong)

Your message dated Thu, 04 Feb 2010 21:49:13 +0100
with message-id <1265316553.2572.6.camel@fz.local>
and subject line closing #563049: Depends: libc6 (> 2.11) probable wrong
has caused the Debian Bug report #563049,
regarding Depends: libc6 (> 2.11) probable wrong
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
563049: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=563049
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: libc-dev-bin
Version: 2.10.2-2
Severity: important

Thanks for uploading a new glibc to experimental.
But looks like libc-dev-bin has a wrong dependency:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  libc-dev-bin: Depends: libc6 (> 2.11) but 2.11~0exp1-0exp1 is to be installed.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers experimental
  APT policy: (500, 'experimental'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages libc-dev-bin depends on:
ii  libc6                         2.10.2-2   GNU C Library: Shared libraries

Versions of packages libc-dev-bin recommends:
ii  manpages-dev                  3.23-1     Manual pages about using GNU/Linux

libc-dev-bin suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 2.11-0exp1

Now that ~ isn't anymore used in version number the packages upgraded
now fine from the unstable 2.10 version.
-- 
Felix Zielcke
Proud Debian Maintainer and GNU GRUB developer

--- End Message ---
Reply to: