Bug#423017: marked as done (internal_utf8_loop_single: Assertion)
Your message dated Sat, 31 Jul 2010 05:58:04 +0200
with message-id <20100731035804.GA31640@hall.aurel32.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#413934: Bug appears to be fixed in squeeze glibc
has caused the Debian Bug report #413934,
regarding internal_utf8_loop_single: Assertion
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
413934: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=413934
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian BTS <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: internal_utf8_loop_single: Assertion
- From: David Weinehall <tao@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 15:23:29 +0200
- Message-id: <20070509132329.GJ11766@vasa.acc.umu.se>
Package: minicom
Version: 2.2-5
Severity: normal
Minicom crashed on me today, with the following error message:
minicom: ../iconv/loop.c:425: internal_utf8_loop_single: Assertion
`inptr - bytebuf > (state->__count & 7)' failed.
Regards: David
--
/) David Weinehall <tao@debian.org> /) Rime on my window (\
// ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ // Diamond-white roses of fire //
\) http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ (/ Beautiful hoar-frost (/
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.11.2-2
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 12:30:28PM +0100, Mike Crowe wrote:
> I've tested minicom in a squeeze chroot using the byte sequence I
> provided earlier. I could not reproduce the problem. Minicom displays
> a strange character (as would be expected) but does not assert.
>
> I tested with:
>
> ii libc6 2.11.2-2 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared libraries
> ii minicom 2.4-2 friendly menu driven serial communication program
>
> So, I think we can call this fixed in squeeze.
>
Thanks for the follow-up, I am marking the bug as fixed in version
2.11.2-2.
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurelien@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
--- End Message ---
Reply to: