Re: Bug#556951: [binutils] objcopy fails with 'Invalid operation'

To: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>, 556951@bugs.debian.org
Cc: debian-glibc@lists.debian.org, Peter Fritzsche <peter.fritzsche@gmx.de>, Bruno Kleinert <fuddl@debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#556951: [binutils] objcopy fails with 'Invalid operation'
From: Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:57:34 -0600
Message-id: <[🔎] 4B04C22E.7020404@debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20091119034351.GA24960@hall.aurel32.net>
References: <1258552119.16030.9.camel@gummipuppe> <4B045555.9070802@debian.org> <200911182154.07136.peter.fritzsche@gmx.de> <[🔎] 4B04A657.7000709@debian.org> <[🔎] 20091119034351.GA24960@hall.aurel32.net>

On 18.11.2009 21:43, Aurelien Jarno wrote:

On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 07:58:47PM -0600, Matthias Klose wrote:

I only see this when upgrading to current glibc in unstable; not with testing.


Could you be more precise with the versions? glibc in testing and
unstable have the same version.


sorry, no. it probably was -5, but I'm not sure.

  Matthias

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bug#556951: [binutils] objcopy fails with 'Invalid operation'
  - From: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>

References:
- Re: Bug#556951: [binutils] objcopy fails with 'Invalid operation'
  - From: Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>
- Re: Bug#556951: [binutils] objcopy fails with 'Invalid operation'
  - From: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>