Re: hppa nptl switch
- To: debian-hppa@lists.debian.org
- Cc: debian-glibc@lists.debian.org, linux-parisc <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>
- Subject: Re: hppa nptl switch
- From: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
- Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 08:08:04 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 4A9CBA44.8040202@aurel32.net>
- In-reply-to: <200908311846.49969.elendil@planet.nl>
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0908181940440.7856@sci.felk.cvut.cz> <119aab440908181851i174315c6lebacea921046bbb0@mail.gmail.com> <20090819124816.GC2517@hall.aurel32.net> <119aab440908302201s35719b5fh3f7d7b1e870c445f@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0908310926590.9856@sci.felk.cvut.cz> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0908310926590.9856@sci.felk.cvut.cz> <119aab440908310810g6fa7e3d8s71f1f4bea0041f1@mail.gmail.com> <200908311846.49969.elendil@planet.nl>
Frans Pop a écrit :
> Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>>> In practice it shouldn't be problem at all.
>>> Debian should make sure that binary/library compiled
>>> against NPTL-hppa-glibc will require NPTL-hppa-glibc
>>> by proper Depends: line like "libc6 (>= 2.10)".
>> Does every package have to do this? I'm not very familiar with all the
>> packaging requirements.
>
> It is something that should automatically get done correctly as long as
> the libc-dev package defines the minimum version that way.
>
> The mechanism that determines this is in /var/lib/dpkg/info/libc6.shlibs.
> Currently this has lines like:
> libc 6 libc6 (>= 2.9)
>
No, as glibc uses symbols files, this file is actually not used.
Nevertheless it is still possible to resolve all symbols to libc6 (>= 2.10).
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurelien@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
Reply to: