Your message dated Fri, 30 Jan 2009 08:58:37 -0500 with message-id <20090130135837.GA25542@caradoc.them.org> and subject line Re: Bug#513341: doesn't contain debugging symbols has caused the Debian Bug report #513341, regarding doesn't contain debugging symbols to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 513341: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=513341 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: doesn't contain debugging symbols
- From: Jörg Sommer <joerg@alea.gnuu.de>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:54:55 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20090128095455.GA9622@alea.gnuu.de>
Package: libc6-dbg Version: 2.9-0exp2 Severity: normal Hi, gdb tells me: Reading symbols from /lib/libpthread.so.0...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/lib/libpthread-2.9.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. (no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libpthread.so.0 Reading symbols from /lib/libm.so.6...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/lib/libm-2.9.so... (no debugging symbols found)...done. (no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libm.so.6 Reading symbols from /lib/librt.so.1...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/lib/librt-2.9.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. (no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/librt.so.1 Reading symbols from /lib/libc.so.6...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/lib/libc-2.9.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. (no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libc.so.6 Reading symbols from /lib/libdl.so.2...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/lib/libdl-2.9.so... (no debugging symbols found)...done. (no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libdl.so.2 Reading symbols from /lib/ld.so.1...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/lib/ld-2.9.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. (no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/ld.so.1 (no debugging symbols found) Or is this a bug in gdb that can't read the detached debugging symbols? Bye, Jörg. -- System Information: Debian Release: unstable/experimental APT prefers unstable APT policy: (900, 'unstable'), (700, 'experimental') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Kernel: Linux 2.6.29-rc2 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to de_DE.UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages libc6-dbg depends on: ii libc6 2.9-0exp2 GNU C Library: Shared libraries libc6-dbg recommends no packages. libc6-dbg suggests no packages. -- no debconf informationAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenPGP
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Jörg Sommer <joerg@alea.gnuu.de>, 513341-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#513341: doesn't contain debugging symbols
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 08:58:37 -0500
- Message-id: <20090130135837.GA25542@caradoc.them.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20090128095455.GA9622@alea.gnuu.de>
- References: <[🔎] 20090128095455.GA9622@alea.gnuu.de>
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:54:55AM +0100, Jörg Sommer wrote: > Reading symbols from /lib/libpthread.so.0...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/lib/libpthread-2.9.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. > (no debugging symbols found)...done. This is deliberate. Those files do contain some debug information - unwind tables used for backtracing, without which debugging other programs is a real pain. If you need to debug libc, set LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/debug. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery
--- End Message ---