Re: Processed: reassign to glibc
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 11:34:58PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 08:01:59PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Please don't reassign a bug to libc6 because you see the word libc6 in
> > the backtrace. A double free is a bug in the package, not in glibc.
> >
> > To get a usable backtrace, just recompile the package with -O0:
>
> I didn't get any response to my last query, so reassignment was the logical
Sorry, but I have probably missed it. Given the ressource we have we are
not able to treat all bugs, and even less to answer all mails.
> recourse. But thanks for the attitude, really in tune with the Christmas
> spirit :P
Reassigning a bug without saying anything is also really annoying. And
building the package with -O0 is the first thing you learn when
debugging.
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' aurel32@debian.org | aurelien@aurel32.net
`- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net
Reply to: