[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

r4024 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . patches/kfreebsd



Author: aurel32
Date: 2009-12-04 06:57:20 +0000 (Fri, 04 Dec 2009)
New Revision: 4024

Modified:
   glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
   glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/kfreebsd/local-sysdeps.diff
Log:
  * kfreebsd/local-sysdeps.diff: update to revision 2977 (from glibc-bsd).



Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
===================================================================
--- glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog	2009-12-02 10:11:14 UTC (rev 4023)
+++ glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog	2009-12-04 06:57:20 UTC (rev 4024)
@@ -7,13 +7,14 @@
     them and then starting them again.  Closes: #211784.
   * Use gcc/g++-4.4 on hppa, hurd-i386, mips and mipsel.
   * Mention EGLIBC in packages description.  Closes: #559121.
+  * kfreebsd/local-sysdeps.diff: update to revision 2977 (from glibc-bsd).
 
   [ Samuel Thibault ]
   * testsuite-checking/expected-results-i486-linux-gnu-libc: Add hurd-i386
     testsuite results.
   * sysdeps/hurd.mk: Enable testsuite.
 
- -- Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org>  Wed, 02 Dec 2009 11:11:02 +0100
+ -- Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org>  Fri, 04 Dec 2009 07:56:39 +0100
 
 eglibc (2.10.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
 

Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/kfreebsd/local-sysdeps.diff
===================================================================
--- glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/kfreebsd/local-sysdeps.diff	2009-12-02 10:11:14 UTC (rev 4023)
+++ glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/kfreebsd/local-sysdeps.diff	2009-12-04 06:57:20 UTC (rev 4024)
@@ -6051,8 +6051,8 @@
 +extern int fchflags (int __fd, unsigned long int __flags) __THROW;
 +
 +
-+extern char *devname_r(dev_t dev, mode_t type, char *buf, int len) __THROW;
-+extern char *devname(dev_t dev, mode_t type) __THROW;
++extern char *devname_r(__dev_t dev, __mode_t type, char *buf, int len) __THROW;
++extern char *devname(__dev_t dev, __mode_t type) __THROW;
 +                                                                                                                                                                                                         
 +__END_DECLS
 +


Reply to: