[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [patches] [PATCH] Fix pthread_mutex_unlock.man recursive semantic



On Sun, 8 Nov 2009, Samuel Thibault wrote:

> Joseph S. Myers, le Sun 08 Nov 2009 00:42:29 +0000, a écrit :
> > On Fri, 6 Nov 2009, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > There is a small error in the pthread_mutex_unlock manpage: as required
> > > by the POSIX norm, recursive mutexes do check that its caller is the
> > > owner of the lock.
> > 
> > What system are you using that supports Linuxthreads with current EGLIBC 
> > (so supports TLS) but not NPTL?
> 
> I'm not.  But Debian uses the linuxthreads manpages for thread stuff.

I think doing so, and taking them from an almost-obsolete legacy part of 
EGLIBC, is a mistake.  The primary documentation of EGLIBC is the Texinfo 
manual, which unfortunately lacks pthreads documentation.  Neither EGLIBC 
nor FSF GLIBC generally maintains manpages for the contained functions; 
instead, there is a separate project that does so, the Linux Man-pages 
Project.  It really would be better for these pages to be adopted by that 
project and maintained there.

I'll apply the patch as it appears to be correct, but I strongly advise 
finding another home to maintain manpages that cover both Linuxthreads and 
NPTL, and suggest the Linux Man-pages Project as that home.

(The timezone data is a successful case of something being imported into 
GLIBC without being maintained there.  It would be good if locale data 
were maintained externally on a similar basis, and it's not clear all the 
miscellaneous utilities installed by (E)GLIBC need to come with the 
library either (for example, because of being closely tied to private 
datastructures or being needed to run the testsuite); (E)GLIBC should keep 
its focus on the actual libraries and things closely tied up with them.)

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com

Reply to: