Re: Please test eglibc 2.9-23+multiarch
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 12:28:30AM +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > The only difference with the unstable version is that libc-bin and
> > libc-dev-bin are splitted out of libc6 and libc6-dev. This way it
> > complies with the Debian Policy requirement that the libraries should
> > not contain binaries, which is also a requirement for multiarch.
> I just tried to upgrade libc6 with experimental. The upgrade has been
> smooth but libc-dev-bin has not been pulled in (whereas libc6-dev has been
> upgraded). Is it the expected behavior ?
Thanks for noticing that. It's not normal that libc-dev-bin is not
pulled, but if you look at the dependencies it actually normal.
I'll try to understand why the dependency is declared in the
debian/control file, but does not appear is in the final binary. Stay
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73